Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Unintended consequences?

Kevin Heatley
Vice President, Biohabitats ISM

Good example of the law of unintended consequences and invasive suppression. Perhaps it should be more aptly named the law of reductionist thinking.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/science/17isla.html?_r=3&ref=science

Saturday, February 07, 2009

Green Roofs

By Keith Bowers
President, Biohabitats, Inc.

I visited the green roof at the California Academy of Sciences in Golden Gate Park in January and was pleasantly surprised! Surprised to see that medium to contain the plants on the steep slopes of the roof are coconut husk trays and surprised to see a wide variety of plant species native to the San Francisco Bay region. Rana Creek Living Architecture, the consultant and installation contractor for the living roof did a fantastic job collaborating with the architect Renzo Piano and the challenges of the roof to come up with a planting medium a plant pallet that supports the native biodiversity of the region. While I am all for green roofs, I get discouraged and frustrated by many of the products being marketed and plant material being used in the name of being ‘green’. Instant green roofs consisting of plastic trays filled with 3” of soil and planted with three varieties of non-native sedum – come on! Is that truly being sustainable? If we are going to create living roofs, let’s do it right! I know cost is an issue, it always will be; but what about the costs of losing biodiversity, or the costs of manufacturing more and more plastic, or the costs of not providing enough soil to at least begin to resemble a sufficient soil profile for soil microorganisms (and ground dwelling insects) to start colonizing and supporting native plants. Let’s push to make green roofs truly ‘green’ and truly ‘living’!! What do you think?

What do you think? Click on the comment link below to see what others are saying and to add your voice to the discussion.

The give and take of living walls

By Nicole Stern
Ecological Designer, Biohabitats, Inc.

“Living Walls,” “Green Walls,” “Vine Walls,” and “Vertical Gardens” are all terms used to describe growing plants on a vertical structure. In nature, many plant species grow on tree trunks or on steep, rocky slopes without much soil. Through using adaptations of these and other plant species tolerant of vertical conditions, designing living walls in a variety of settings is all the rage – but hardly a new idea. Examples range from the Hanging Gardens of Babylon to the “ivy” in Ivy League Universities. Recent innovations in the structure of living walls allow much more control and variety of plant palette. Wire trellis encouraging vines up walls are one of the more simple structures, while artists such as Patrick Blanc in France use a thin structure of plastic lining, metal, and thin textiles to support dense swaths of colorful plant species, creating botanical paintings. Other companies offer plastic and metal trays which hold pockets of soil at an angle in a modular wall system. Whether indoor, outdoor, vine, textile/hydroponic, or soil based, living walls offer many benefits including air filtration, cooling, improved aesthetics, water filtration, food growing, and more. The indoor living wall at Biohabitats, for example, pulls air through the structural fabric and rootzone of the plants into the air circulation system for the office to filter office air.

Touted as a “green” technology, these vegetated walls have great potential. They have already been shown to improve indoor air quality. Vertical gardening in dense, urban landscapes offers a potential solution for food production. However, some living walls may be taking more than they give. While visiting a recently installed “green wall” in a store within a shopping mall, I wondered how sustainable some of these walls are if they require artificial lighting, a supply of potable water, constantly circulated by an electric pump through their rootzone, and are separated from any food chains or natural cycles. Does the air purification service and ornament of a living wall balance out energy and water resource demand? Should living walls only be considered a “sustainable” feature if they provide more service than they demand?

What do you think? Click on the comment link below to see what others are saying and to add your voice to the discussion.